Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 132|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Freeman explains that whether grain

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2022-9-26 16:43:31 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
本帖最後由 mostakimseo09 於 2022-9-26 15:02 編輯

This objective evaluation measures the granularity of the film. Schematic courtesy of Kodak Film sensitivity is related to grain surface area in sensitized films the fastest or most sensitive grains are also the largest. Graininess is more apparent in shadows and underexposed areas because predominantly the most sensitive or largest grains were exposed. From the series The dogs of Santiago.

The grain added in postproduction amplifies the reportage feel e-commerce photo editing of the image. The grain defect or quality grain For a long time grain was considered a problem caused by the use of very sensitive films. However it is also a subjective quality. Michael is considered an interference in the image as if it is believed to be something added is a matter of opinion. Although this author indicates that From a purist approach grain should be avoided because it covers the image and breaks up the smallest details.



If the ideal is a perfectly resolved image with soft tones grain is a strange element However it is paradoxical that graininess is sometimes actively sought in digital photography. Even the grain became part of our visual language. Now it is important to distinguish the graininess of analog photography from the visual interference characteristic of digital capture.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|Comsenz Inc.

GMT+8, 2026-9-15 11:44 , Processed in 0.028276 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表